Ask Jack

Ask Jack is an online communication channel offered by CalSTRS CEO Jack Ehnes. This Web forum solicits questions about the funding and administration of the CalSTRS Defined Benefit Program. Not all will be posted directly, but Jack's responses will be inclusive of views and perspectives. 

Has Jack already answered your question?

Submit a question » 

Please send personal benefit questions to the CalSTRS Contact Center.

Can you explain what CalSTRS is doing about reports of pension spiking?

CalSTRS takes pension spiking very seriously, which is why we have, and continue to aggressively pursue instances of suspected spiking. Our internal controls and processes to identify and resolve instances of spiking include regularly conducting school district audits and analyzing employer compensation reports to identify excessive increases that could affect the member’s final compensation factor.

Could the Governor’s 12-Point proposal reduce benefits for current retirees or reduce anticipated benefits for members?

There are two provisions that may impact current retirees or reduce anticipated benefits for members and one that deals with contributions paid by members.

What is the earliest Governor Brown's 12-point pension reform proposal could be implemented and where can I find the proposal?

No one can predict the outcome or precise timing of any potential pension reform measures. As meaningful discussions on pension reform take shape, it’s important to remember that the Governor’s 12-Point proposal must work its way though the legislative process before anything is official.

Are reports that suggest the state needs to increase CalSTRS annual funding by $3.8 billion for the next 30 years accurate?

Recent media reports have suggested that to solve the unfunded liability the state will have to increase CalSTRS funding by $3.8 billion a year for 30 years for a total of more than $114 billion.

How is CalSTRS communicating the potential, unintended consequences new GASB accounting standards may have on school employers?

On October 13, 2011, CalSTRS along with a number of our stakeholders participated in GASB’s public hearing and formally recommended the Board to suspend adoption of the Exposure Drafts as they are currently written until more appropriate accounting standards can be implemented.

Will the Governor's 12-point pension reform proposal affect reciprocity between CalPERS and CalSTRS?

CalSTRS is thoroughly reviewing the Governor’s pension reform proposal and any potential implications that may follow. It is important to keep in mind that this is currently only a proposal and will be further discussed in the Legislature.

Meantime, we do not anticipate any direct effect on concurrent retirement, or what some may refer to as reciprocity, between the CalPERS and CalSTRS plans. Again, the most pressing need CalSTRS has is a plan of action to address the long-term funding shortfall, which only the Legislature and Governor have the authority to implement.

What is the Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s intent behind new accounting rules?

GASB‘s intent behind the new accounting rules is to implement improved financial reporting, which CalSTRS supports. However, in their current state, the proposed GASB amendments do not accurately address the cost-sharing accountability structure of the CalSTRS pension system.

Will any of the Governor’s proposed pension reforms have an impact on CalSTRS members who are already retired?

Although we are still analyzing all of the potential implications of the Governor’s pension reform proposal, two provisions - the prohibition of retroactive pension increases and the limitation of post-retirement employment – may apply to retired members if adopted as they are currently written.

What is CalSTRS doing in response to the California State Auditor’s label of the Defined Benefit Program as a ‘High Risk Issue?’

CalSTRS has been very transparent in providing the Legislature and Administration with financial data that illustrates the need to address a $56 billion funding shortfall, the gap between projected future assets and obligations to retired educators. CalSTRS assisted the State Auditor in developing the information for the report which further underscores that, absent any thoughtful action, the fund is projected to be depleted in the early 2040s.

Did CalSTRS recently suspend its home loan program because of the funding shortfall?

CalSTRS is temporarily suspending its Home Loan Program because the program’s administrator and loan servicing agent, Bank of America, has decided to sell their correspondent lending business. The suspension, effective October 1, 2011, is not in any way related to CalSTRS long-term funding shortfall.

I understand that CalSTRS is funded until 2043. What percent is CalSTRS funded?

The last actuarial valuation, a snapshot of the CalSTRS fund’s assets and liabilities, as of June 30, 2010, shows the fund is 71 percent funded. Another important number from the actuarial valuation is the amount of the funding shortfall. This difference between projected future assets and future benefit payments is currently $56 billion.

After this wild ride with the stock market, why is CalSTRS still investing in stocks?

CalSTRS, as a “forever” investor, considers the long-term value of investments rather than short-term market activity. Despite the greater risk, equities provide a higher return over the long term than bonds.

I see CalSTRS news releases mention the fiduciary duty of the CalSTRS trustees. Break that down for me.

As a fiduciary, each Teachers' Retirement Board member is to perform duties and make decisions to guide the system solely for the benefit of CalSTRS members and to do so in an economical manner. That means each of the trustees must think of how the decisions they are asked to make will benefit the members of the system first, before all other considerations.

News said you had a second year of excellent investment returns. Are you out of the woods with the funding problem?

Despite the good news on ending the fiscal year with a 23.1 percent investment return, we can’t count on investments to close the long-term funding gap. We estimate it would take four more years of 20 percent investment returns to wipe out the $56 billion unfunded liability. That’s an unreasonable expectation given the current state of the global economy and financial markets.

Wouldn’t a 401(k) plan be more cost effective than maintaining the defined benefit system and also solve the funding problem?

It would be extremely costly for CalSTRS to freeze its current defined benefit plan system and transition to a 401(k) system.

Would it be better for us teachers to pay into and receive a Social Security benefit?

No, it would either be more costly or provide small benefits. A coordinated benefit structure for CalSTRS members that included Social Security contributions or factored them into a member’s benefits would add an additional cost of $1.8 billion each year for employers and members, or reduce benefits for CalSTRS members by 33 percent.

You say investment earnings fund 55% of benefits yet contributions only total 18.11%? Wouldn’t investments need to be 81.89%?

The 18.11 percent contributed by members, school districts and the state is based on a percentage of total state teacher payroll.

The 55 percent figure is instead based on an annual average of the total benefits paid for by investment earnings over the past 15 years. The remaining amount of total benefits paid over the last 15 years, averaging 45 percent each year, comes from contributions from members, school districts and the state.

Is the 8 percent investment assumption still current?

After 10 months of thoughtful analysis and discussion, the Teachers' Retirement Board at its December 2010 meeting lowered the assumed rate of return on investments from 8 percent to 7.75 percent.

In percentage, what is the contribution by teachers, the districts and the state? What is the revenue from investments?

Contribution rates are set by state law. CalSTRS members contribute 8 percent of their pay to CalSTRS, a rate that has not changed for nearly 40 years. School districts contribute 8.25 percent of each member’s earnings, an amount that has not increased since 1990. Since 1998, the state’s contribution to the Defined Benefit Program has decreased from 4.607 percent of payroll to the current 2.017 percent. The state pays an additional 2.5 percent of payroll for purchasing power protection.

Is CalSTRS considering taking away the service credit for unused sick leave we now receive when we retire?

CalSTRS does not have the authority to change the Defined Benefit Program benefit structure. Only the state legislature and the Governor may do that. No legislative proposal has been introduced that would change the core benefits (retirement, disability and survivor benefits) structure, which includes the unused sick leave provision.